Do we talk about the tremendous trifles of life that we fail to notice the important issues plaguing our current society? Our society has succeeded to prevent us from thinking by inundating our minds with far too many distractions—self-image, consumerism and the likes—that it leaves us no time to truly understand what we are doing and where we are going.
How many, when we plan for a trip, do not bother with the destination? Do we just purchase a one-way ticket to, say, Australia and thereafter wonder from the plane to wherever the crowd seems to be heading without due regard to getting somewhere or even back? Do we allow the mass to decide for us?
Many people unconsciously hold on to that mindset in spite of the profession to distinguish themselves in society. They have their idea of success molded by vogue standards and strive blindly towards being formed in the image of society. They have exchanged their own liberty for bondage to the whims of society.
Herein lies a massive paradox: on one hand, we talk about self-fulfillment and the need to think on our feet. Notwithstanding, we still circumvent our own opinions for the vogue. As Chesterton aptly advised, fallacies do not cease being fallacies just because they are fashions. How then do we break free from the subtle fetters of the tyranny of society?
Certainly, the realization of the futility of forcing ourselves into society’s mold and the mindless following is the first and major step towards liberation. It is after all true that the road to reform starts from the identification of the problem.
The next would be to know in which direction to head from the problem. It would be pointless to escape one problem just to land into another; one that may be far worse. Where should one look to for the right direction to head? This question is important as our society presents a myriad of options—some blatantly self-referential and others flying in the face of practical wisdom.
We all want to be remembered for something, and go about founding a heresy to which we might one day be famous for. Any serious and sincere soul would discover in the end that the carefully crafted heresy is actually orthodoxy. He has bravely set out to discover a new land only to find out that he discovered his own country anew.
Our world, in its present state, is like the scene of a shipwreck with fragments of goods from the mother ship washed ashore. These goods are reminiscent of the world now nebulous by a pervading spiritual amnesia. The remnants of a world now far and hazy leave us panting for it though we may not have our fingers on it. Our desires are mysteries that suggest expectations that were hardwired for the lost world.
Researchers in psychology and business define satisfaction as experience aligning expectation; dissatisfaction is hence the antecedent. Man is by far the most dissatisfied creature on this planet and one can conclude of a universal expectation frustrated by the fleeting best earth affords.
Mythology recounts what scientist and philosophers hope to achieve—the state of ideal: our very own utopia. The portrayal of heaven in myths mirrors—in our day—scientific achievements, economic, social, political reforms and more. Man has always been on the search to recover what was lost and vaguely reminded of. The desire is masked in many different forms; ours began with the Industrial and French Revolution.
Our predicament is the result of a most un-liberal denial of the supernatural. Can one be a liberal and condemn the supernatural? Wouldn’t that be akin to striking one’s foot in contradiction? Isn’t a liberal supposed to be open to all views? However, that being said, not choosing a viewpoint is to already have made a choice: one of indifference. It is pretty obvious thus that nobody can say that he does not take sides; if one does not make a choice, he has made a choice not to choose.
When the supernatural is ousted, what remains is less than natural. You cannot remove music and still call a piano, or a violin for the matter, a music instrument since music doesn’t exist. The natural, likewise, has its identity firmly rooted in the supernatural.
We would do well to look to the supernatural—the fuller reality—for our purpose. Before going on, it would do well to mention a few words about the supernatural.
When one thinks of the supernatural, the images of wraiths and incorporeal objects come straight to mind suggesting an inferior existence. This is surely a mark of faulty thinking. From the word supernatural, it suggests something above nature. How can anything above nature be poorer than her? Perhaps a better way of seeing the supernatural is as a realm of greater and more concrete reality than our own even though we may not perceive it. A two dimensional square, if vested with anthropomorphic consciousness, would certainly be bewildered by the notion of a three dimensional cube. Yet the latter has more form the former. The supernatural realm is exactly the same—its existence is far more complete than our own.